I’m in DC today for the New Media Women Entrepreneur summit. Here’s a live blog that’s also pulling in tweets with the hashtag #nmwe.
Author: Greg Linch
Ideas for visiting Virginia Commonwealth University graduate journalism class
I’ll be trekking down to Richmond, the capitol of the commonwealth I now call home, to speak with a graduate-level online journalism class on Friday evening. My esteemed Publish2 colleague (and all-around awesome dude) Ryan Sholin was not able to attend and I’ve been invited to discuss what we do, how journalism is changing and whatever other topics can fit into the session.
Maybe I’ll even throw in some of the ol’ tips.
As would be expected, I posed a question on Twitter about what I should discuss.
- ckanal: @greglinch Awesome, congrats! Twitter, personal branding + networking.
- AAdamGlenn: @greglinch Def’nly social media (see: http://bit.ly/socmediaskills). But also participatory jurno, curation, entrepreneurship
- lavrusik: @greglinch The importance of understanding the fundamental shift to social news and the need for them to innovate. Sounds flowery, I know.
- MikeHigdon: @greglinch why they should start their own start ups…
(Tweets curated and published with ease courtesy of this and this.)
Thanks to Craig Kanalley, Adam Glenn, Vadim Lavrusik, Mike Higdon and Yuri Victor for their advice. These are all great topics and I hope to touch on as many as possible.
As I read the responses, I thought more about the best approach for the visit. Here’s what I’m thinking now:
- Introduce myself
- Ask students to introduce themselves
- Discuss their interests and goals
- Ask what they want to discuss
- Maybe show some things on the screen
- Challenge assumptions, if warranted
The last point bounced around my head as I asked the question and read the answers, most likely because it was the topic of my Skype video chat with Dave Stanton‘s senior-level journalism class earlier this month.
Then I saw this and laughed:
- danielbachhuber: Questioning the assumptions will always produce mind-blowing results.
Daniel and are often on the same wavelength, but this was just a funny coincidence. He sent that tweet via text message and wasn’t responding to me (I doubt he even saw the question).
I will qualify and say I don’t think you will always get mind-blowing results, but we could all use a little more challenging of assumptions now and then. Particularly when it comes to journalism education and how we deal with related conversations.
So let me know what you think of this approach and what would you discuss if you were speaking to a graduate-level online journalism class.
Videojournalism brain dump: Some advice I’ve picked up over the past few years
Poynter College Fellows win again, this time on video. Seriously, that e-mail group is inspiring me. And, yes, I was asked directly. I don’t just randomly spout off like this. Ok, not THIS much. Thanks #pcf09 kids.
This is in response to a request for advice on teaching a video workshop for high school journalists [Update: to clarify, they already have some video recording and editing experience]. One earlier point I made in the thread was about Web vs. TV. And with that...
Ok, so in general, mostly big-picture tips for videojournalism. Quick follow-up, I shouldn’t have said “Web video” before. I consider this advice more in the non-traditional broadcast style because “Web video” should scale to mobile, TV, Hulu, iPhones, pocket watches (wait, what?), whatever (h/t Chuck Fadely re scaling).
I’m biased toward a documentary-style videojournalism, so here it goes:
- The story rules. If it’s all pretty pictures, make me a slideshow.
- You’re making a video — not taking a video (h/t Kenny Irby, who really brought it home). It’s not yours. You’re just helping the person or people tell their story or stories (h/t Rich Beckman).
- Lexicon is important (h/t Kenny). Just like with making vs. taking, you’re not shooting, killing, chopping anything. And you’re not a shooter. Words matter. You’re better than that.
- Video for Web can’t suck just because it’s online. As Rich says, it should be better because it’s primarily being viewed at a smaller size, which enhances your sense of imperfections. But it can also be viewed full-screen, on TV, etc.
- Shorter = better. But there’s no rule for length. It should be as long (really, as short) as it needs to be.
- You’re not doing soundbites — you need to ask subjects questions so you have them telling as complete a story as possible [Update: As Eric noted in the comments, and I almost included here the first time, this includes making sure you have full sentences. Also, I’ll add that you need to the proper context. How? Awesome questions.], which leads to…
- Avoid narration (way too many people use it as a crutch, both on Web and TV). It should be your absolute last resort. Only reason to use it, I think, is if the story suffers without it. Also, somewhat related…
- Ditch standups. I don’t want to see you. I don’t want to hear you. I’m watching your video because I care about the subject — not you. Sorry.
- On that note, I don’t really want to see them talking either. More so if it’s just them sitting in a chair, in a boring office, with their boring talking head. The less talking head, the better. If I only see a talking head once, I’m happy.
- Get it in the field, the first time (h/t Jim Virga). Yes, technology allows you to clean up sound and color correct video, but it’s still not going to be as good, it can be very time consuming and it’s lazy [field work]. In that vein…
- There’s a saying that audio is 70 percent of video (h/t Miami Herald vjs). Most people are more forgiving if the visuals aren’t great, but if the audio sucks, they’re probably saying see ya. I can’t emphasize audio enough.
- Headphones. Always. It shouldn’t even need to be on here. And they’re not your be-all-end-all. The audio meter to see levels is your bestest friend in the whole wide world.
- Have the eye of a photojournalist making pictures when you aim the camera.
- Get tons of b-roll. There’s an 80:20 “rule,” which basically means get a lot more footage than you need. Which ties into…
- You may only have one chance to get everything you need. Don’t take anything for granted in terms of interviews and b-roll.
- No canned shots or b-roll. If you ask someone to repeat something they’ve done or do something they plan to do, you’re making stuff up. Sorry. Not good journalism. Any re-enactments, simulations, etc. should, first, be avoided at all costs and, if you must, be clearly disclosed.
- Record mostly in the range of medium and tight, but be sure to get establishing (wide) shots.
- Record sequences.
- Story. Just wanted to make sure you remembered.
- There’s no formula.
- Try interesting angles and approaches (h/t Mike Schmidt). Break outside the “safe” zone (h/t Jim). If it doesn’t work, don’t use it. If it does, cool.
- Your goal should be to use as few (ideally, no) automatic settings as possible (go manual with exposure, white balance, sound and focus) once you’re comfortable with the gear (h/t Jim). I want you to say, “This is my camera. There are many like it, but this one is mine.” You need to explore all the buttons and menus and settings. You need to be able to troubleshoot any problem that you could possibly troubleshoot. When you’re a professional, you can’t make excuses (h/t Jim Virga). No one will want to work with you. If it’s really beyond your control, then it might not be your fault, but you still don’t have what you need. (This is more a problem on deadline.)
- Just because you can create a video full of narrative, doesn’t mean you should. Sometimes, you just need to let the pictures do the talking. If the video can show it better than a person can describe, just leave that out.
- There is no perfect video. It can never really be finished (h/t Jim Virga). You need to accept and embrace that it can always be better. That’s why it’s so important to knock out as much as you can as early as you can. The more time you have to edit and re-edit and re-edit again, the more time you have to get feedback, the more time you have to sleep on it, etc., the better.
- How’s that audio? Just checking.
- Send it to everyone who’s opinion you value or can give you constructive feedback. That’s good for several reasons; namely, it’ll will make you better and it will help get your work/name out there.
- Show your video to the subjects. If they have e-mail, send them the link. If they don’t, go to them with your computer. Again, it’s not for you. It’s for them and your viewers. (h/t Rich)
- There’s no magic. It’s not something you’re born with. It’s almost all skills you can learn with practice.
- You’re doing an important job. Keep at it and kick butt.
Non-attributed parts were learned along the way on my own or by some combination of by lessons from professors Rich Beckman and Jim Virga and professionals (check out their stuff online): Chuck Fadely, Travis Fox, Brent McDonald, Garrett Hubbard, Ricardo Lopez and other people I’ve seen speak. Also from articles and blog posts. Just trying to give proper credit.
Speaking of Travis, some great advice: Ten Golden Rules of Video Journalism.
And great resources:
- NewsVideographer (plus anything in her blogroll)
- Newspaper Video
- Documentaries are great sources of inspiration [we watched parts of several in Jim’s class]
- And, of course, video journalism on news sites (NYT, WaPo, MediaStorm and the like)
That got a little out of hand again. Sorry. I wasn’t trying to be comprehensive, so there may be some points left out.
Everyone: What would you add/subtract/take the square root of?
Good luck, sir.
Greg
PS. Yeah, I’ll probably blog this one too. You guys are good, inspiring me to write!
Same question: What would you add/subtract/take the square root of?
Update: I’ve made some minor grammatical changes.
Update 2: People in the e-mail thread have added great insights, such as understanding video for different platforms at a conceptual level, how to plan, how to improvise, etc. Interviewing is huge too. After doing videojournalism for a about two years, I can say without a doubt it has made me a much better interviewer (and listener) after being primarily a text-based reporter for the five years prior.
Poynter fellows’ e-mail thread: Response to a “social media” question
One of my fellow former fellows asked our pcf09 Google Group about social media, singling me out near the end of her message. After I wrote this response (sent 6:33 p.m. CT), I thought “sharing is caring,” so here you go!
Whoa, I kinda feel on the spot. Well, um… I’m going to cop out and defer to some smarter people/sites/articles except to say that I think some of the most important things to understand, for this group of already amazing storytellers and journalists, are the fundamentals of what’s changed/how things continue to change in news/media/journalism and everything related to engagement. Challenge your assumptions about how things have been done and should be done and always try to step back and think outside the conventional MSM wisdom.
Sorry, this kinda turned into a brain dump:
1. I’ve been compiling a heapin-o-links. Disregard the guidelines part — it’s basically links for online engagement as it relates or can relate to journalism.
http://www.publish2.com/newsgroups/social-media-guidelines
2. Some interesting presentations here:
http://www.slideshare.net/greglinch/favorites
3. Extremely insightful discussion by two brilliant minds on this podcast with Jay Rosen and Dave Winer (I started from the beginning; almost all caught up. Only 19 episodes so far). [Gah! Forgot to mention “sources go direct” in the e-mail]
4. I’ve been slowly consuming Here Comes Everbody by Clay Shirky, another brilliant guy (see Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable). Not for lack of interest, just the opposite actually. My approach has been to read a section or chapter or two at a time, usually before bed. That let’s the ideas marinate and gives me more time to think on the details and take more away from it, versus speed-reading more for the big concepts.
http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody
5. Next up on my list is What Would Google Do by Jeff Jarvis.
http://www.buzzmachine.com/what-would-google-do
6. One specific idea (see all related comments and posts) of “newsroom as a cafe:”
http://www.danielbachhuber.com/2009/06/12/newsroom-as-a-cafe
http://www.digidave.org/2009/02/journalism-business-idea-the-newsroom-cafe.html
http://steveouting.com/2008/02/29/why-news-companies-should-go-into-the-internet-cafe-business/
7. I want to start paying a different kind of attention to the tech industry, specifically hows and whys as opposed to “oooh, that’s a cool shiny new toy.” Journalism is becoming much more like it as the two overlap more and more.
Everyone, please share any of your favorite links, read, listens, etc.!
Best,
Greg
<exhale />
Dallas Morning News mid-internship recap and John F. Kennedy project introduction
I can’t believe my Dallas Morning News internship is more than half over. It’s been great so far, specifically because of the freedom and opportunities I’ve been afforded. Here’s are some highlights so far (Update: now with links!):
- Working on a newsroom social media strategy, best practices and how-to guide with Travis Hudson (more on this in a future post)
- Reporting, including a front page story on the DTV transition and following the story of an abandoned newborn
- Managing the Facebook page
- Occasionally managing the Twitter account
- Occasional online producing
- Worked with more than a dozen journalists, individually or in pairs, to better use social media tools like Twitter, Facebook, etc.
- Helped produce live coverage of American Idol audition coverage, working with another Web producer, reporters at the scene and managing community collaboration and contributions
- Contributing ideas to the interactive team, Problem Solver column and overall organization
And today I filmed a video for a feature, reporting alongside a another Web intern working on the article.
One of my backburner projects that’s now moving to the frontburner is re-imagining and rebuilding the DMN’s John F. Kennedy page.
I’ve been brainstorming and researching since before I arrived and, now that things are kicking into gear, I’d like your help and feedback.
For the first post in this series I’d like your thoughts about the following before hearing mine or anyone else’s ideas:
- Who is the audience/community?
- What is the purpose of this page/section?
- What story are is it telling?
- What’s the best way to tell the story?
- What content should be included? (More than 45 years later, we have loads of stories, obits, journalists’ accounts, photos, TV broadcasts, front pages, documents, etc.)
- What do you want to see when you first arrive?
- How do you want to navigate through this?
- With all of this, how can we engage people and foster quality conversations?
- How can we best integrate community content and comments?
- How can we best keep it dynamic and alive?
The first multimedia committee meeting for the project is Thursday Wednesday (July 29).
Know anyone who may have good insights? Pass it along! Many thanks in advance.